<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Write That Down - Latest Comments in Statistics</title><link>http://writethatdown.disqus.com/</link><description>Start-up Product Management.</description><atom:link href="https://writethatdown.disqus.com/statistics/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 19:43:27 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Statistics</title><link>http://writethatdown.com/archives/2008/10/statistics#comment-2812077</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yep, for sure. I am starting to lean more and more to running simple,&lt;br&gt;quick listening labs and meshing that with actual analytics or numbers&lt;br&gt;to see how things line up.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Problem is, you want the product to mature a bit before diving in to&lt;br&gt;those activities. Not years, but a couple of months and a solid user&lt;br&gt;base.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adam Bullied</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 19:43:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Statistics</title><link>http://writethatdown.com/archives/2008/10/statistics#comment-2802657</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Statistics can be great... but can also be biased.  You always have to question the source behind the provider.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stewart Rogers</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 12:21:00 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>